Trolley Problem
A thought experiment that probes the ethics of action versus inaction and the tension between consequentialism and deontology when sacrificing one life could save several.
Category: Philosophy & Wisdom
Tags: philosophies, philosophy, ethics, morality, thought-experiments
Explanation
The trolley problem is a well-known thought experiment in moral philosophy, first formulated by the British philosopher Philippa Foot in 1967 and later developed extensively by Judith Jarvis Thomson. In its classic form, a runaway trolley is heading toward five people tied to the track who will be killed. You stand beside a lever that can divert the trolley onto a side track where it will kill one person instead. The question is whether it is permissible, or even required, to pull the lever.
Most people judge that diverting the trolley to kill one and save five is acceptable. Thomson introduced a variant that produces the opposite intuition. In the footbridge case, the only way to stop the trolley is to push a large stranger off a bridge onto the track, killing him but saving the five. Although the arithmetic is identical, most people feel that pushing the man is wrong, and the puzzle is to explain this difference.
The scenario sharply divides two families of ethical theory. Consequentialism, especially utilitarianism, judges actions purely by their outcomes and therefore tends to favor whatever saves the most lives. Deontological ethics, by contrast, holds that certain acts, such as deliberately using a person as a means to an end, are wrong regardless of the consequences, which helps explain the resistance to pushing the man off the bridge.
Philosophers appeal to several distinctions to make sense of our intuitions, including the difference between doing harm and merely allowing it, and the doctrine of double effect, which distinguishes harm intended as a means from harm foreseen as a side effect. These proposals attempt to capture why redirecting a threat feels different from directly using someone's body to block it.
Beyond the seminar room, the trolley problem has become a touchstone for real ethical dilemmas, from wartime decisions to the programming of autonomous vehicles that may have to distribute unavoidable harm. It endures because it isolates, in a vivid and minimal way, deep disagreements about responsibility, intention, and the limits of maximizing good outcomes.
Related Concepts
← Back to all concepts